How Insurance Companies Deny Cargo Claims
Inherent Vice Exclusion
This represents the most powerful cargo claim denial tactic. Insurance companies classify most damage as inherent vice rather than external events.
Inherent vice refers to intrinsic product characteristics making goods prone to damage. Perishable items spoiling, metals rusting, and electronics failing from temperature all constitute inherent vice.
They argue product nature caused damage not transit conditions. Produce ripening during shipment gets denied as inherent characteristic.
Iron machinery rusting from humidity faces inherent vice denial. They claim shipper should have protected equipment from natural deterioration.
Sealed plastic bottles deforming from pressure changes during air transport demonstrate inherent packaging characteristics. These claims get denied regularly.
Burden of proof lies with insurance companies demonstrating inherent vice caused damage. However they aggressively pursue these denials.
Inadequate Packaging Arguments
Cargo insurance excludes damage from improper packaging. Insurance companies investigate packaging methods searching for any deficiencies.
They claim industry standards require specific protective measures. Missing cushioning materials, insufficient container strength, and inadequate moisture barriers all face scrutiny.
Fragile items broken during normal handling get denied as packaging failures. Liquid products leaking from containers face improper packaging denials.
They argue shippers must package goods for transit conditions. Any damage suggesting packaging inadequacy eliminates coverage.
Small packaging defects become bases for denying entire claims. They use packaging as convenient denial mechanism avoiding payment.
Pre-Existing Damage Disputes
Insurance companies claim damage existed before transit. They argue losses did not occur during covered transportation period.
Without documentation proving pre-shipment condition, claims face denial. They demand inspection reports showing good condition at origin.
Photographs and surveyor inspections before transit become essential. Proving damage occurred during covered period requires comprehensive documentation.
They investigate cargo history searching for evidence of prior damage. Any indication of pre-existing problems justifies denial.
Failure to Mitigate Further Damage
Policies require shippers take reasonable steps minimizing losses after incidents. Failure to prevent additional damage reduces or eliminates coverage.
Damaged refrigeration equipment requires immediate action protecting perishable goods. Delays implementing emergency measures face coverage reduction.
Insurance companies argue shippers should have transferred cargo to working equipment. Any preventable additional damage becomes shipper responsibility.
They minimize coverage claiming losses exceeded necessary amounts. Reasonable mitigation efforts must be documented.
Late Notice and Missed Deadlines
Most policies require immediate notification of damage or loss. Strict reporting timelines apply with claims requiring filing within 9 months.
Delayed notification results in claim denial regardless of legitimacy. Insurance companies argue late reporting prevented proper investigation.
Delivery receipts must note damage at receipt time. Clean receipts eliminate ability to claim concealed damage.
Failing to inspect cargo promptly eliminates coverage. Time-sensitive notification requirements get strictly enforced.
Documentation Inadequacy
Insurance companies demand extensive documentation proving losses. Missing bills of lading, delivery receipts, or inspection reports lead to denials.
They require proof damage occurred during covered transit period. Without comprehensive documentation claims get reduced or denied.
Cargo values require substantiation through invoices and appraisals. Unproven value claims face automatic reduction.
Temperature logs, security records, and handling documentation all become necessary. Insufficient paperwork provides denial justification.
Underinsurance Exploitation
High-value cargo claims reveal underinsurance by as much as $20 million. Insurance companies pay only policy limits regardless of actual losses.
Businesses discover inadequate coverage during major claims. Annual policy reviews miss changing cargo values.
They apply coinsurance penalties when coverage falls below required percentages. Underinsurance reduces payments beyond just limit gaps.
Proper valuation and coverage analysis prevent leaving businesses vulnerable to massive uncovered losses.